|
Background
Livestock - Environment - Watershed project
he
Livestock, Environment and Development (LEAD) Initiative has identified,
at a global scale, the consequences of increased demand for animal
protein on natural resources. LEAD has highlighted the close interaction
between government policies and the environmental impact of livestock
production.
Many of the world's grazing areas are threatened with degradation.
Livestock production plays a crucial role in the management and
utilisation of semi arid and arid lands of India. Under these conditions,
animal husbandry is the traditional and major source of livelihood
of people with arable farming playing more of a complementary role.
Farmers make use of common property resources, pastures and water
to keep their animals. In general there is a decrease in overall
availability of these resources while there is still an increase
in overall livestock numbers. An increase in competition can result
in a switch from communal grazing to mixed farming systems, most
likely first to crop residues, followed by cut and carry, and feed
from farm sub-systems. Changes in the prevalence of systems can
be an indication for a response to such a pressure. With population
growth, the area under arable crops is expanding. The crops leave
straw and weeds after harvest valuable by livestock. But the crop
encroachment disrupts pastoral areas, causing artificially local
grazing pressure and an irregular overgrazing. Access to water can
be limited by cultivation of river banks, irrigation and sometimes
water diversion upstream also large areas of traditional dry season
pastures, on soils having the best water-holding capacity, are converted
into cropland. Trees usable for browsing are cut to clear fields
if they are not traditionally protected in agro-forestry parks.
The principal negative environmental impact of livestock in semi-arid
zones is land degradation with reduction of vegetative cover, increase
in soil erosion, artificial increase in aridity by run-off, sometimes
encroachment of pasture by weeds and exotic scrubs, and the loss
of domestic animal biodiversity. Rapid depletion of natural resources,
more especially the common property resources, partly due to growing
human and livestock population and due to adoption of non sustainable
practices, have seriously affected the poor, marginalized and landless
people, especially women, who have depended on these resources for
maintenance of their livestock and their own livelihood.
Watersheds have become recognised as a key and discrete development
unit in rural development. To achieve sustainable increase of productivity
and management, integrated approaches have been recommended. The
intensification and diversification of production is viewed from
a livelihood perspective. For sustainable livelihoods, the trade-off
between agricultural productivity, equity and sustainability is
critical. A preliminary study on Livestock-Environment Interactions
in Watersheds in India concluded that the Watershed Development
Policy of the Government of India does not include a livestock component.
Because of this, livestock is not systematically included in watershed
management projects and the socio-economic and environmental importance
of livestock is not analysed. The need to fill this void calls for
an in depth study of the actual policy framework and recommendations
for to improve the design and policies of future programmes.
The Swiss Agency for Development and Co-operation, (SDC) Natural
Resources Management concept paper for India states as its goal
to “contribute to the sustainable improvement of livelihood
systems of the rural households in the rain fed areas through increased
productivity of natural resources by improved land use management,
including livestock production and dairying”. In pursuit of
this goal SDC has been a pioneer in introducing innovations and
new concepts in watershed development since the mid-nineteen eighties,
through Participative Integrated Development of Watersheds. The
merging of the land use and livestock development programmes under
one natural resources management sector is of particular relevance
for the watershed development programme. Various collaboration programmes
on watershed development have been launched, with Government and
Non Government partners, in the States of Karnataka, Andrah Pradesh
and Rajasthan. A study on relationships and interaction between
the changes livestock production system and the environmental effects
on communal and individual land use/crop and animal productivity
in watersheds would provide additional insight in watershed management
by the people and would be an important input for programme development.
For the LEAD Initiative one of the critical "hotspots"
of the livestock and environment interaction is the watershed and
land degradation. To achieve a sustainable livestock production
and to encourage stewardship of resources, the people that depend
on the land for their livelihood must have a say in, and more responsibility
for its management. Measures must also be adopted to improve marketing
and institutions for drought preparedness and to ensure access rights
to grazing and water resources.
The LEAD Initiative has assembled a wide array of design
and planning tools to assist the decision making process on sustainable
issues related to the interaction livestock, environment and development.
These tools include impact analysis programs, predictive computer
models, geographical information systems, databases, socio economic
analysis programs and relevant information material. One of these
tools is the Livestock and Environment Toolbox which helps the decision
makers to identify appropriate technology and policy interventions
within the domain of animal production-environment interactions.
The Toolbox is still very general and the need for modules for specific
cases has risen in several case studies. A set of decision support
tools including a module of the Toolbox for watershed management
in India would be a powerful aid to introduce the livestock and
environment interaction concept to fill the existent policy void.
Rationale for the study in the context of the
watersheds
Watersheds in the
Indian context have come to be acknowledged as key and discrete
units in rural development. Integrated Watershed Development Programs
have clearly established that they are an important vehicle to achieve
the objectives of: 1) increases in production and availability of
food, fodder and fuel, 2) restoration of agro ecological balance
and, 3) in improving the livelihood status of the village communities.
The intensification
and diversification of production systems in watersheds has to be
viewed from a livelihood perspective. For sustainable livelihoods,
the trade off between productivity, equity and sustainability is
critical.
Various collaborative
watershed development projects (WDPs) have been implemented in India,
involving Government and NGO partners in many states. These in general
are believed to have brought out certain changes in livestock production
systems also, involving shift from extensive system with low productive
stock to stall-fed systems with relatively high producing animals,
using increased quantity of forages, improved use of Common Property
Resources including upper marginal areas, improvement of livestock
management systems. This, of course, may not be true in all situations.
Watershed development programmes are often not recognized as providing
substantial benefits to livestock-based livelihood dependence, especially
through enhanced productivity of biomass that is or should be accessible
to marginal farmers or landless.
Presently the general
scenario witnessed in most of watersheds is that increased emphasis
is placed on soil and water conservation efforts in preference to
productivity linked best agronomic practices.
Similarly livestock
production is often not complementing crop production to the desirable
extent. Often, fodder is not grown as a part of crop rotation, which
otherwise would enhance soil fertility and reduce the incidence
of pests and diseases. Nor are crop by products sufficiently valued
as feed inputs for livestock.
Though livestock
is generally considered as of high importance particularly for resource
poor families, there is a lack of an explicitly spelled out priority.
If at all included, livestock activities are considered under income
generating activities, restricting its perspective and focus, under
watershed programmes.
Though the importance
of livestock in watershed management is generally recognized, there
is a conspicuous absence of data and analysis on watershed management-
livestock interaction at the strategic, institutional as well as
on the operational level. As a matter of fact livestock does not
seem to be considered a priority in the relevant strategy papers.
This deficit corresponds
also with the lack of systematic research and documentation of livestock
activities in government and donor sponsored projects in India.
In relation to small ruminants, there is a wide spread bias concerning
their negative role on environment. Small animals such as poultry
and pigs are not treated at all.
Livestock's interaction
(directly and indirectly) with the natural resources is neglected
in strategy and policy, particularly with reference to addressing
the issues on rural poor and poverty and gender. But the critical
issue is to ensure that such interactions do not lead to depletion
of natural resources, which will be inimical to the development
of both the livestock and natural resources.
There is a fast
growing demand for livestock products and theincreasing dependency
on livestock for sustainable livelihood systems in the developing
countries, particularly in the rural areas. Therefore, a critical
understanding of and the need for evolving appropriate measures
to promote livestock while preserving the natural resource base
is imminent for countries such as India.
The theme Livestock
Environment Interactions (LEI), itself is quite new and there is
a general lack of information on the theme. The levels of awareness
and interest on LEI, among the field level workers, NGOs, Research
institutions, Donor agencies and Government agencies seem to be
rather poor. There is a great need to promote this awareness and
interest among the above and to bring greater conceptual clarity
and broad perspective, on the theme in India and with implications
for other countries/ regions where investments in watershed development
are likely to have an impact on natural resource based livelihoods
including livestock.
Working hypotheses
Livestock keeping
is of prime importance in semi-arid areas for the livelihood of
resource poor households and the sustainability of agriculture based
production systems.
The management of
CPR (access, changing size, productivity) is critical to livelihood
security.
Watershed management
activities contribute to the increase of income from livestock on
a sustainable basis, i. e. without the depletion of natural resources.
Through participatory
approaches and promotion of the organization of the stakeholders
in a watershed the productivity of land based Common Property Resources
has improved and the access by resource poor households has become
more equitable.
Benefits from livestock
keeping are invested in the sustainable management of natural resources.
|